4.6 Article

Cooperative Look-Ahead Control for Fuel-Efficient and Safe Heavy-Duty Vehicle Platooning

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2542044

Keywords

Distributed model predictive control; dynamic programming; fuel-efficient platooning; look-ahead control; optimal control; platooning; safe platooning

Funding

  1. Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  2. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme within the COMPANION Project [610990]
  3. Svenska Forskningsradet Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The operation of groups of heavy-duty vehicles at a short inter-vehicular distance, known as platoon, allows one to lower the overall aerodynamic drag and, therefore, to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. However, due to the large mass and limited engine power of trucks, slopes have a significant impact on the feasible and optimal speed profiles that each vehicle can and should follow. Maintaining a short inter-vehicular distance, as required by platooning, without coordination between vehicles can often result in inefficient or even unfeasible trajectories. In this paper, we propose a two-layer control architecture for heavy-duty vehicle platooning aimed to safely and fuel-efficiently coordinate the vehicles in the platoon. Here, the layers are responsible for the inclusion of preview information on road topography and the real-time control of the vehicles, respectively. Within this architecture, dynamic programming is used to compute the fuel-optimal speed profile for the entire platoon and a distributed model predictive control framework is developed for the real-time control of the vehicles. The effectiveness of the proposed controller is analyzed by means of simulations of several realistic scenarios that suggest a possible fuel saving of up to 12% for follower vehicles compared with the use of standard platoon controllers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available