4.3 Article

A procedure for calculating the thermal constants associated with the flight period of Cerambyx welensii Kuster and Prinobius myardi Mulsant from field observations

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 82-90

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/afe.12139

Keywords

Cerambyx welensii; degree-days; Prinobius myardi; xylophagous

Categories

Funding

  1. Environmental Council of the Andalusian Regional Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1 Field observations conducted in a dehesa in the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula over a period of 8 years (2002-2009) allowed the development and validation of two degree-day phenology models for predicting the flight period of Cerambyx welensii Kuster (1846) and Prinobius myardi Mulsant (1892). 2 The start dates and functional development temperatures for the two species were estimated using an iterative method. The start dates were found to be 1 April for C. welensii and 15 April for P. myardi. The minimum development temperature for both species was 12 degrees C. 3 The thermal constants associated with each flight percentage studied (1-99% at 10% intervals) were calculated from Gompertz curves fitting the equation CPE = exp [-exp(3.97+ 0.009DD)] (r(2) = 0.955) for C. welensii and CPE= exp[-exp(6.50-0.008DD)] (r2 = 0.817) for P. myardi, where CPE is the cumulative percentage of emergence and DD is degree-days. 4 The validation procedure revealed that the proposed models predict cumulative flight percentages with errors of 2.5-4.3 days for C. welensii and 3.2-18.2 days for P. myardi 5 The simplicity of the proposed method for calculating thermal constants and the small errors with which they can be estimated allow the widespread use of the models for efficiently managing populations of the two xylophagous cerambycids under study. This can be incorporated into a useful and novel element in the fight against the deterioration of a valuable ecosystem within the European Union.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available