3.8 Review

The effects of L-carnitine supplementation on lipid concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 246-255

Publisher

TABRIZ UNIV MEDICAL SCIENCES & HEALTH SERVICES
DOI: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.43

Keywords

L-Carnitine; Lipid Profile; Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on lipid profile. A systematic search were conducted in PubMed and Scopus to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which evaluated the effects of L-carnitine on lipid profile. Pooled effect sizes were measured using random-effect model (Dersimonian-Laird). Meta-analysis showed that L-carnitine supplementation significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC) (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -8.17 mg/dL; 95% CI, -14.68 to -1.65, I-2=52.2%, P = 0.041). Baseline level of TC was a source of heterogeneity, with a greater effect in studies with a baseline level of more than 200 mg/d (WMD: -11.93 mg/dL; 95% CI, -20.80 to -3.05). L-carnitine also significantly decreased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD: -5.22 mg/dL; 95% CI, -9.54 to -0.91, I-2=66.7%, P = 0.010), and LDL-C level <100 mg/dL), trial duration, and L-carnitine dosage were potential sources of heterogeneity. L-carnitine supplementation appeared to have no significant effect on high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (WMD: -0.51 mg/dL; 95% CI, -2.45 to 1.44) and triglyceride (TG) (WMD: 2.80 mg/dL; 95% CI, -8.09 to 13.69). This metaanalysis revealed that L-carnitine may have favorable effects on lipid profile, especially LDL-C and TC. However, further RCTs are needed to confirm the veracity of these results, particularly among hyperlipidemic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available