4.8 Article

Characterization of a putative sensory [FeFe]-hydrogenase provides new insight into the role of the active site architecture

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 47, Pages 12789-12801

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc03319g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF19OC0055613]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [714102]
  3. European Research Council under Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant) [897555]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the priority program 1927 [1554/5-1]
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [KAW 2015.0418]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[FeFe]-hydrogenases are known for their high rates of hydrogen turnover, and are intensively studied in the context of biotechnological applications. Evolution has generated a plethora of different subclasses with widely different characteristics. The M2e subclass is phylogenetically distinct from previously characterized members of this enzyme family and its biological role is unknown. It features significant differences in domain- and active site architecture, and is most closely related to the putative sensory [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Here we report the first comprehensive biochemical and spectroscopical characterization of an M2e enzyme, derived from Thermoanaerobacter mathranii. As compared to other [FeFe]-hydrogenases characterized to-date, this enzyme displays an increased H-2 affinity, higher activation enthalpies for H+/H-2 interconversion, and unusual reactivity towards known hydrogenase inhibitors. These properties are related to differences in active site architecture between the M2e [FeFe]-hydrogenase and prototypical [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Thus, this study provides new insight into the role of this subclass in hydrogen metabolism and the influence of the active site pocket on the chemistry of the H-cluster.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available