4.7 Review

Chemical Element Concentrations of Cycad Leaves: Do We Know Enough?

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae6040085

Keywords

Bowenia; Ceratozamia; Cycadaceae; Cycas; Dioon; Encephalartos; leaf element composition; leaf tissue analysis; Lepidozamia; Macrozamia; Stangeria; Zamia; Zamiaceae

Categories

Funding

  1. United States Forest Service [13-DG-11052021-210, 17-DG-11052021-217]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The literature containing which chemical elements are found in cycad leaves was reviewed to determine the range in values of concentrations reported for essential and beneficial elements. We found 46 of the 358 described cycad species had at least one element reported to date. The only genus that was missing from the data was Microcycas. Many of the species reports contained concentrations of one to several macronutrients and no other elements. The cycad leaves contained greater nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations than the reported means for plants throughout the world. Magnesium was identified as the macronutrient that has been least studied. Only 14 of the species were represented by data from in situ locations, with most of the data obtained from managed plants in botanic gardens. Leaf element concentrations were influenced by biotic factors such as plant size, leaf age, and leaflet position on the rachis. Leaf element concentrations were influenced by environmental factors such as incident light and soil nutrient concentrations within the root zone. These influential factors were missing from many of the reports, rendering the results ambiguous and comparisons among studies difficult. Future research should include the addition of more taxa, more in situ locations, the influence of season, and the influence of herbivory to more fully understand leaf nutrition for cycads.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available