4.7 Article

Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis InhA: Design, synthesis and evaluation of new di-triclosan derivatives

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 28, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115744

Keywords

InhA; Triclosan; Triazole; Isoniazid; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TB

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Antimicrobials and Antimicrobial Resistance (AAMR) doctoral training programme Birmingham/Nottingham [203974/Z/17/A, 215154/Z/18/Z]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council doctoral training studentship [BB/M008770/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust [203974/Z/17/A] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) represents a growing problem for global healthcare systems. In addition to 1.3 million deaths in 2018, the World Health Organisation reported 484,000 new cases of MDR-TB. Isoniazid is a key anti-TB drug that inhibits InhA, a crucial enzyme in the cell wall biosynthesis pathway and identical in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis. Isoniazid is a pro-drug which requires activation by the enzyme KatG, mutations in KatG prevent activation and confer INH-resistance. 'Direct inhibitors' of InhA are attractive as they would circumvent the main clinically observed resistance mechanisms. A library of new 1,5triazoles, designed to mimic the structures of both triclosan molecules uniquely bound to InhA have been synthesised. The inhibitory activity of these compounds was evaluated using isolated enzyme assays with 2 (5-chloro-2-(4-(5-(((4-(4-chloro-2-hydroxyphenoxy)benzyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)phenoxy)phenol) exhibiting an IC50 of 5.6 mu M. Whole-cell evaluation was also performed, with 11 (5-chloro-2-(4-(5-(((4-(cyclopropylmethoxy)benzyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)phenoxy)phenol) showing the greatest potency, with an MIC99 of 12.9 mu M against M. bovis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available