4.6 Article

Provably Secure Timed-Release Proxy Conditional Reencryption

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 2291-2302

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2014.2385778

Keywords

Cloud computing; data protection; designated ciphertext delegation; reencryption; timed-release delegation

Funding

  1. Taiwanese Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 103-2221-E-110-057]
  2. National Sun Yat-sen University (NSYSU)-Kaohsiung Medical University Joint Research Project under Grant NSYSUKMU [103-I001]
  3. NSYSU
  4. Taiwanese Ministry of Education through the Aim for the Top University Plan
  5. Grants of Academia Sinica, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cloud storage service is getting popular nowadays. It can help users synchronize their files stored in various devices and allows them to share their files with others. However, it has been indicated that the privacy of the stored files is not protected well in cloud service. Recently, many solutions have been proposed in literature, but most of them cannot support secret file sharing when they are deployed in a cloud environment. In addition, in some situations, a file owner may hope that the receiver cannot get the actual file content until a specified time arrives. Nevertheless, most of the existing solutions cannot achieve these goals simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a timed-release proxy conditional reencryption scheme for cloud computing. Not only is the privacy of users' files guaranteed but also each user can freely share some desired file with another user under the restriction on the time factor. In other words, a receiver cannot obtain any information about the file until a designated time arrives. It also provides flexible encryption. Finally, we demonstrate the security of our proposed scheme via formal proofs based on the random oracle model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available