4.7 Article

Secrecy Analysis of Ambient Backscatter NOMA Systems Under I/Q Imbalance

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 10, Pages 12286-12290

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3006478

Keywords

Ambient backscatter communication; in-phase and quadrature-phase imbalance; non-orthogonal multiple access; physical layer security

Funding

  1. Henan Scientific and Technological Research Project [182102210307, 202102210122]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province [NSFRF180309]
  3. Outstanding Youth Science Foundation of Henan Polytechnic University [J2019-4]
  4. Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province [20A510007]
  5. NSFC of China [61601414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this correspondence, we investigate the reliability and the security of the ambient backscatter (AmBC) non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) systems, where the source aims to communicate with two NOMA users in the presence of an eavesdropper. To be practical, we assume that all nodes and backscatter device (BD) suffer from in-phase and quadrature-phase imbalance (IQI). More specifically, some analytical expressions for the outage probability (OP) and the intercept probability (IP) are derived. In order to obtain more insights, the asymptotic behaviors for the OP in the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime are explored, and corresponding diversity orders are derived. Numerical results show that: 1) Although IQI reduces the reliability, it can enhance the security; 2) Compared with the orthogonal multiple access (OMA) systems, the considered AmBC NOMA systems can obtain better reliability when the SNR is lower; 3) There are error floors for the OP in the high SNR regime due to the reflection coefficient beta; 4) There exists a trade-off between reliability and security.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available