4.6 Article

Study of the Binder Influence on Expansion/Contraction Behavior of Silicon Alloy Negative Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 167, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abcf4f

Keywords

silicon alloy; Batteries; Lithium; Polymer binders; Dilatometry; In situ optical microscopy

Funding

  1. European Union [653531]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [390874152]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [653531] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In lithium-ion batteries, Si-based materials such as silicon alloys are regarded as a promising alternative to graphite negative electrode to achieve higher energy. Unfortunately, they often suffer from a large volume change that can result in poor cycle life. We monitored the electrode expansion/contraction that occurs during lithiation/delithiation in real time by electrochemical dilatometry. Volume changes of Si alloy-based electrode with three different polymer binders have been compared. Electrode manufactured with lithiated polyacrylic acid (LiPAA) exhibited the greatest expansion but also demonstrated the highest reversibility as well as the best cycling performance. Ex situ SEM imaging along with dilatometer measurements revealed that electrode porosity after contraction (delithiation) increases compared to that after precedent expansion (lithiation), which can buffer volume expansion at the subsequent cycle. Proof-of-concept in situ optical microscopy (IOM) experiments were carried out with the best performing LiPAA electrode. The results demonstrated that LiPAA electrode in the IOM cell expanded much less than the same electrode in the dilatometer cell. This implies that internal pressure existing in a lithium-ion cell has a great impact on total electrode expansion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available