4.7 Article

In-stream oxygenation to mitigate internal loading of phosphorus in lowland streams

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 590, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125536

Keywords

Sediment P flux; Short term P additions; Stream oxygenation; Sediment-water interactions

Funding

  1. agency for Innovation by Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many lowland regions are afflicted with episodic high phosphorus (P) concentrations in streams during low flow periods. It has been hypothesised that these P peaks are due to internal loading after reductive dissolution of ferric iron (Fe(III)) minerals in sediments with a high P/Fe ratio. Here, we experimentally tested that hypothesis by measuring the sediment/water fluxes of P in streams and by testing responses to in-stream oxygenation. A phosphate stock solution with a bromide (Br-) tracer was administered during 3 h in four streams with varying sediment P/Fe ratios during summer (low DO concentration). The experiment was repeated in winter (high DO concentration) in one of the streams. The sediments were either net P sinks (three cases), net unreactive (one case) or a net source (one case), with the net source occurring in the stream with the highest sediment P/Fe and at lowest DO concentration. A direct oxygenation experiment in one stream increased downstream DO concentration with about 1 mg O-2 L-1 and decreased the P concentration with, on average, about 0.3 mg P L-1 over a two-week period. The efficiency of oxygenation to reduce P concentrations enhanced when flow rates were lower. In conclusion, this experimental study confirmed the hypothesis that internal P loading in streams is largest in high P/Fe sediments at low DO conditions. Lowering P concentrations in lowland streams should combine reduced P emission and strategies avoiding low DO concentration, i.e. reduced biological oxygen demand (BOD) and nutrient emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available