4.4 Article

Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer

Journal

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages E123-E145

Publisher

MULTIMED INC
DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6147

Keywords

Baseline staging; imaging; distant metastases; breast cancer; early-stage

Categories

Funding

  1. Ontario Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In Ontario, there is no clearly defined standard of care for staging for distant metastasis in women with newly diagnosed and biopsy-confirmed breast cancer whose clinical presentation is suggestive of early-stage disease. This guideline addresses baseline imaging investigations for women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic for distant metastasis. Methods The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for evidence from January 2000 to April 2019, and the best available evidence was used to draft recommendations relevant to the use of baseline imaging investigation in women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic. Final approval of this practice guideline was obtained from both the Staging in Early Stage Breast Cancer Advisory Committee and the Report Approval Panel of the Program in Evidence-Based Care. Recommendations These recommendations apply to all women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer (originating in the breast) who have no symptoms of distant metastasis Staging tests using conventional anatomic imaging [chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest-abdomenpelvis computed tomography (CT)] or metabolic imaging modalities [integrated positron-emission tomography (PET) /cT, integrated PET/magnetic resonance imaging (Mm), bone scintigraphy] should not be routinely ordered for women newly diagnosed with clinical stage i or stage ii breast cancer who have no symptoms of distant metastasis, regardless of biomarker status. In women newly diagnosed with stage III breast cancer, baseline staging tests using either anatomic imaging (chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest-abdomen-pelvis CT) or metabolic imaging modalities (PET/CT, PET/MRI, bone scintigraphy) should be considered regardless of whether the patient is symptomatic for distant metastasis and regardless of biomarker profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available