4.0 Article

The spatiotemporal expression patterns of MSC-associated markers contribute to the identification of progenitor subpopulations in developing limbs

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 10-12, Pages 499-506

Publisher

UNIV BASQUE COUNTRY UPV-EHU PRESS
DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.200247jm

Keywords

MSC; limb progenitor cell; limb subpopulation; MSC marker

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT)-Fronteras de la Ciencia [1887]
  2. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico (DGAPA)-Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) [IN211117, IN215320]
  3. Programa de Maestria en Ciencias Bioquimicas, UNAM
  4. CONACyT-Fronteras de la Ciencia [1887]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During limb development, skeletal tissues differentiate from their progenitor cells in an orchestrated manner. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), which are considered to be adult undifferentiated/progenitor cells, have traditionally been identified by the expression of MSC-associated markers (MSC-am) and their differentiation capacities. However, although MSCs have been isolated from bone marrow and a variety of adult tissues, their developmental origin is poorly understood. Remarkably, adult MSCs share similar differentiation characteristics with limb progenitors. Here, we determined the expression patterns of common MSC-am throughout mouse hindlimb development. Our results demonstrate that MSC-am expression is not restricted to undifferentiated cells in vivo. Results from the analysis of MSC-am spatiotemporal expression in the embryonic hindlimb allowed us to propose five subpopulations which represent all limb tissues that potentially correspond to progenitor cells for each lineage. This work contributes to the understanding of MSC-am expression dynamics throughout development and underlines the importance of considering their expression patterns in future MSC studies of the limb.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available