4.6 Article

Fluorine-Free Transparent Superhydrophobic Nanocomposite Coatings from Mesoporous Silica

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 36, Issue 45, Pages 13426-13438

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01767

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC DTP [EP/R512400/1]
  2. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) [203145Z/16/Z]
  3. NICEDROPS project - European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [714712]
  4. EPSRC [EP/G036675]
  5. Azkonobel
  6. EPSRC [1917780] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in the development of functional, fluorine-free superhydrophobic surfaces with improved adhesion for better applicability into real-world problems. Here, we compare two different methods, spin coating and aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition (AACVD), for the synthesis of transparent fluorine-free superhydrophobic coatings. The material was made from a nanocomposite of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) functional mesoporous silica nanoparticles and titanium cross-linked polydimethylsiloxane with particle concentrations between 9 to 50 wt %. The silane that was used to lower the surface energy consisted of a long hydrocarbon chain without fluorine groups to reduce the environmental impact of the composite coating. Both spin coating and AACVD resulted in the formation of superhydrophobic surfaces with advancing contact angles up to 168 degrees, a hysteresis of 3 degrees, and a transparency of 90% at 550 nm. AACVD has proven to produce more uniform coatings with concentrations as low as 9 wt %, reaching superhydrophobicity. The metal oxide cross-linking improves the adhesion of the coating to the glass. Overall, AACVD was the more optimal method to prepare superhydrophobic coatings compared to spin coating due to higher contact angles, adhesion, and scalability of the fabrication process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available