4.6 Article

3-Gb/s High-Speed True Random Number Generator Using Common-Mode Operating Comparator and Sampling Uncertainty of D Flip-Flop

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 605-610

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSSC.2016.2625341

Keywords

Data encryption; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) test; true random number generator (TRNG)

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea through the Korean Government within the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2016R1E1A1A02922127]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20131612106, 2016R1E1A1A02922127] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

True random number generators (TRNGs) are important in data encryption for information security applications. In this paper, we propose a TRNG that utilizes a comparator in the common-mode operation and the sampling uncertainty of a D flip-flop (DFF). The comparator output is affected by the input common-mode noise and the noise that is simultaneously self-induced. A slicer generates an unpredictable and asynchronous pulse to the input of the DFF according to the output-referred noise of the comparator. By sampling the random pulse with a 3-GHz external clock, there is a sampling uncertainty, which helps to increase the random quality. As a result, we use the independent two random sources for TRNG. The area of the designed circuit is 1609 mu m(2). In spite of the small size, the data rate of the proposed TRNG is 3 Gb/s. We verify that the output bit stream passes all of the National Institute of Standards and Technology test suites. We fabricate the TRNG in a 65-nm CMOS process with a 1.2-V supply voltage. The power consumption of the proposed TRNG is 5 mW, and the energy per bit is 1.6 pJ/b.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available