4.2 Article

Whitlockite Granules on Bone Regeneration in Defect of Rat Calvaria

Journal

ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 7762-7768

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c00960

Keywords

whitlockite granules; interconnected porous; calvarial defect; osteogenesis; bone regeneration.

Funding

  1. Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital [PNUDH DRI-2020-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whitlockite (WH; Ca18Mg2(HPO4)(2)(PO4)(12)) is a calcium phosphate based ceramic that contains magnesium ions. As the second most abundant mineral in living bone, WH occupies 25-35 wt % of the inorganic portion of human bone. Compared to hydroxyapatite ( HAp, Ca-10(PO4)(6)(OH)(2)), WH possesses better mechanical properties, faster resorbability, and promotion behavior on the osteogenesis. In this article, we introduced a fabrication method of interconnected porous WH granules through vacuum filtration, followed by sintering treatment based on the thermal stability of WH synthesized using the tri-solvent system. This study presents a histological, radiological, and immunohistochemical evaluation of the bone healing potential of these WH granules in a 5 mm diameter calvarial bone defect in rats. The histological evaluation shows no inflammation or foreign body reaction in the WH group. The WH group displays newly formed bone at the same thickness as the original bone. On the contrary, bone formation is not observed in the nontreated (NT) group. Besides, immunohistochemistry (IHC) confirmed that WH granules promoted bone regeneration with the significantly higher expression of bone morphogenetic proteins-2 (BMP-2), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteopontin (OPN), and osteocalcin (OCN) compared to the NT group without the addition of exogenous cells or growth factors. These results suggest that WH has excellent potential for application in bone tissue regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available