4.2 Article

Evaluation of Injectable Naloxone-Releasing Hydrogels

Journal

ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 7858-7864

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c01016

Keywords

self-assembly; hydrogel; peptide nanofibers; naloxone release; opioid addiction management

Funding

  1. NJIT startup funds
  2. NJIT Undergraduate Research and Innovation (URI) program
  3. NIH [R15 EY029504]
  4. NSF [IIP 1903617]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The opioid epidemic in the United States is a serious public health crisis affecting over 1.7 million Americans. In the last two decades, almost 450 000 people have died from an opioid overdose, with nearly 20% of these deaths occurring in 2017 and 2018 alone. During an overdose, overstimulation of the mu-opioid receptor leads to severe and potentially fatal respiratory depression. Naloxone is a competitive mu-opioid-receptor antagonist that is widely used to displace opioids and rescue from an overdose. Here, we describe the development of a slow-release, subcutaneous naloxone formulation for potential management of opioid overdose, chronic pain, and opioid-induced constipation. Naloxone is loaded into self-assembling peptide hydrogels for controlled drug release. The mechanical, chemical, and structural properties of the nanofibrous hydrogel enable subcutaneous administration and slow, diffusion-based release kinetics of naloxone over 30 days in vitro. The naloxone hydrogel scaffold showed cytocompatibility and did not alter the beta-sheet secondary structure or thixotropic properties characteristic of self-assembling peptide hydrogels. Our results show that this biocompatible and injectable self-assembling peptide hydrogel may be useful as a vehicle for tunable, sustained release of therapeutic naloxone. This therapy may be particularly suited for preventing renarcotization in patients who refuse additional medical assistance following an overdose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available