4.2 Review

Protein-Based Hydroxyapatite Materials: Tuning Composition toward Biomedical Applications

Journal

ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 3441-3455

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c00140

Keywords

collagen; composites; fibrin; fibroin; hydroxyapatite (HAp); keratin; sericin

Funding

  1. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy - LEPABE - national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UIDB/00511/2020]
  2. Portuguese National Funds from FCT.Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UID/Multi/04044/2019]
  3. project Biotherapies-Bioengineered Therapies for Infectious Diseases and Tissue Regeneration [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000012]
  4. Interreg V-A POCTEP Programme through FEDER funds from the European Union [0245_IBER-OS_1_E]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/Multi/04044/2019] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic hydroxyapatite (HAp) has been successfully produced with the aim of obtaining biomaterials that meet the biomechanical requirements for bone tissue engineering, while being compatible with the surrounding biochemical and cellular environment. Combining proteins with HAp can generate improved composite biomaterials, which are environmentally friendly, renewable, and biocompatible. In this context, HAp/protein-based composite materials have been widely exploited since the late 20th century to the present day. In this review, we explore the biomedical relevance of the association of HAp with several proteins of interest such as fibroin, sericin, fibrin, and keratin. The processing strategies for their synthesis and effect on the obtained shape and physicochemical, mechanical, and biological performance are herein discussed. This work can provide useful information for the design of HAp-based biomaterials with specific emphasis on bone tissue regeneration characteristics for biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available