4.2 Article

Floquet dynamics in light-driven solids

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043408

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 925]
  2. Cluster of Excellence CUI: Advanced Imaging of Matter of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [EXC 2056, 390715994]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union [319286]
  4. Stiftung der DeutschenWirtschaft
  5. European Research Council [ERC-2015-AdG694097]
  6. Flatiron Institute of the Simons Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate how the properties of light-induced electronic Floquet states in solids impact natural physical observables, such as transport properties, by capturing the environmental influence on the electrons. We include the environment as dissipative processes, such as interband decay and dephasing, often ignored in Floquet predictions. These dissipative processes determine the Floquet band occupations of the emergent steady state, by balancing out the optical driving force. In order to benchmark and illustrate our framework for Floquet physics in a realistic solid, we consider the light-induced Hall conductivity in graphene recently reported by McIver et al. [Nat. Phys. 16, 38 (2020)]. We show that the Hall conductivity is estimated by the Berry flux of the occupied states of the light-induced Floquet bands, in addition to the kinetic contribution given by the average band velocity. Hence, Floquet theory provides an interpretation of this Hall conductivity as a geometric-dissipative effect. We demonstrate this mechanism within a master equation formalism, and obtain good quantitative agreement with the experimentally measured Hall conductivity, underscoring the validity of this approach which establishes a broadly applicable framework for the understanding of ultrafast nonequilibrium dynamics in solids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available