4.7 Article

Triple Collocation Analysis of Soil Moisture From Metop-A ASCAT and SMOS Against JRA-55 and ERA-Interim

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2632306

Keywords

Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT); data assimilation; soil moisture; Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS); triple collocation

Funding

  1. EUMETSAT Visiting Scientists Program of the Japan National Personnel Authority
  2. Japanese Government Short-term Overseas Fellowship Program of the Japan National Personnel Authority
  3. eartH2Observe project (European Union's Seventh Framework Program) [603608]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the quality of Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) surface soil moisture (SSM) retrievals with respect to other SSM products derived from the passive Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission and two reanalysis datasets, i.e., the JRA-55 and the ERA-Interim. In particular, the purposes of this study are to 1) characterize the global error structure of the satellite products, 2) understand the spatiotemporal variability of SSM at global scale, and 3) investigate in which areas the assimilation of satellite data may add value to reanalysis. For these purposes, we applied standard statistical methods as well as triple collocation analysis (TCA) for estimating signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). In line with previous studies, we find large and spatially variable biases between all four datasets, but overall spatiotemporal dynamics as reflected in Hovmoller diagrams agree well. With the exception of arid and semiarid environments, ASCAT performs better than SMOS in terms of both its correlation with the models and the SNR. As a result of TCA, we recognize the potential areas for assimilation of ASCAT data, characterized by a high SNR of the satellite data compared to the models, to be the savanna regions in Africa and Central Asia, southwestern North America, and eastern Australia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available