4.7 Article

Comparing Performances of Crop Height Inversion Schemes From Multifrequency Pol-InSAR Data

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2668358

Keywords

Agriculture; interferometry; radar polarimetry; synthetic aperture radar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry has shown great potential to estimate the height of crops and forests by inverting simple scattering models of the canopy and the underlying soil. The random-volume-over-ground (RVoG) model assumes that the scatterers within the canopy (e.g., stalks and leaves) are not aligned along a preferred direction. If these scatterers are characterized by a correlation of orientations, then the scene is better described by the oriented-volume-over-ground (OVoG) model. This paper investigates the plausibility of the random volume and oriented volume assumptions, as well as the robustness of single-and dual-baseline inversion schemes in relation to agricultural crop height estimation. To this end, we implemented different single-and dual-baseline techniques for the inversion of the RVoG and OVoG models, and we evaluated their height retrieval performances with the help of simulated observations and experimental F-SAR measurements in L-, C-, and X-Bands. The inversion results revealed a positive relationship between the bias of the estimated height and the differential extinction when the RVoG inversion scheme is applied. By contrast, no such dependence was observed for the OVoG inversion, whose height estimates are on average consistent with the actual values (i.e., median bias below 10% in magnitude). Despite the observed superiority of dual-baseline approaches, the study also pointed out the feasibility of crop height estimation using single-baseline RVoG inversion schemes, provided the appropriate a priori constraints (e.g., on the extinction coefficient) and crop-specific configuration parameters (e.g., C-Band for maize, and C-and X-Bands for wheat).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available