4.7 Review

Integration of single-cell multi-omics for gene regulatory network inference

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 1925-1938

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.06.033

Keywords

Single-cell sequencing; Gene regulatory network inference; Single-cell multi-omics integration

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2019A1515011917, 2020B1515310008]
  2. Project of Educational Commission of Guangdong Province of China [2019KZDZX1007]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen [JCYJ20190808173603590, JCYJ20170817 100950436, JCYJ20170818091621856]
  4. Interdisciplinary Innovation Team of Shenzhen University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The advancement of single-cell sequencing technology in recent years has provided an opportunity to reconstruct gene regulatory networks (GRNs) with the data from thousands of single cells in one sample. This uncovers regulatory interactions in cells and speeds up the discoveries of regulatory mechanisms in diseases and biological processes. Therefore, more methods have been proposed to reconstruct GRNs using single-cell sequencing data. In this review, we introduce technologies for sequencing single-cell genome, transcriptome, and epigenome. At the same time, we present an overview of current GRN reconstruction strategies utilizing different single-cell sequencing data. Bioinformatics tools were grouped by their input data type and mathematical principles for reader's convenience, and the fundamental mathematics inherent in each group will be discussed. Furthermore, the adaptabilities and limitations of these different methods will also be summarized and compared, with the hope to facilitate researchers recognizing the most suitable tools for them. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available