4.8 Article

FRET-Based Assay for the Quantification of Extracellular Vesicles and Other Vesicles of Complex Composition

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 92, Issue 23, Pages 15336-15343

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02271

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2017-04029]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council [2017-04029] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research in the field of extracellular vesicles is rapidly expanding and finding footholds in many areas of medical science. However, the availability of methodologies to quantify the concentration of membrane material present in a sample remains limited. Herein, we present a novel approach for the quantification of vesicle material, specifically the quantification of the total lipid membrane surface area, found in a sample using Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). In this assay, sonication is used to drive the fusion between vesicles in the sample to be quantified and liposomes containing a pair of FRET fluorophores. The change in emission spectrum upon vesicle fusion is directly related to the total membrane surface area of the sample added, and a calibration curve allows for the quantification of a variety of vesicle species, including enveloped viruses, bacterial outer membrane vesicles, and mammalian extracellular vesicles. Without extensive optimization of experimental parameters, we were able to quantify down to similar to 10(9) vesicles/mL, using as little as 60 mu L of the sample. The assay precision was comparable to that of a commercial nanoparticle tracking analysis system. While its limit of detection was slightly higher, the FRET assay is superior for the detection of small vesicles, as its performance is vesicle-size-independent. Taken together, the FRET assay is a simple, robust, and versatile method for the quantification of a variety of purified vesicle samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available