4.6 Article

Extensive Screening of Green Solvents for Safe and Sustainable UiO-66 Synthesis

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 46, Pages 17154-17164

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05587

Keywords

Metal-organic frameworks; Zirconium; Synthesis; Green chemistry; Sustainability

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi di Perugia
  2. MIUR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zirconium based metal-organic framework UiO-66 is to date considered one of the benchmark compounds among stable MOFs, and it has attracted huge attention for its employment in many strategic applications. Large scale production of UiO-66 for industrial purposes requires the use of safe and green solvents, fulfilling the green chemistry principles and able to replace the use of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), which, despite its toxicity, is still considered the most efficient solvent for obtaining UiO-66 of high quality. Herein we report on a survey of about 40 different solvents with different polarities, boiling points and acidities, used for the laboratory scale synthesis of high quality UiO-66 crystals. The solvents were chosen according to the European REACH Regulation 1907/2006 among those having a low cost and low toxicity and being fully biodegradable. Concerning MOF synthesis, the relevant parameters chosen for establishing the quality of the results obtained are the degree of the crystallinity, microporosity, specific surface area, yield, and solvent recyclability. Taking into account also the chemical physical properties of all the solvents, a color code was assigned in order to give a final green assessment for the UiO-66 synthesis. Defectivity of the obtained products, the use of acidic modulators, and the use of alternative Zr salts have been also taken into consideration. Preliminary results lead to the conclusion that GVL (gamma-valerolactone) is among the most promising solvents for replacing DMF in UiO-66 MOF synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available