4.8 Article

Altered rRNA processing disrupts nuclear RNA homeostasis via competition for the poly(A)-binding protein Nab2

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 20, Pages 11675-11694

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa964

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's Data-Driven Discovery Initiative [GBMF4551]
  2. Harry Baccigaluppi Fellowship
  3. Horace O Lanza Scholarship
  4. Margrit Mondavi Fellowship
  5. Chaine des Rotisseurs Scholarship
  6. Carpenter Memorial Fellowship
  7. Haskell F Norman Wine AMP
  8. Food Fellowship
  9. NIH T32 [GM007377]
  10. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM124120]
  11. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 130231, PJT 386315]
  12. W.M. Keck Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key mediators of RNA metabolism. Whereas some RBPs exhibit narrow transcript specificity, others function broadly across both coding and non-coding RNAs. Here, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we demonstrate that changes in RBP availability caused by disruptions to distinct cellular processes promote a common global breakdown in RNA metabolism and nuclear RNA homeostasis. Our data shows that stabilization of aberrant ribosomal RNA (rRNA) precursors in an enp1-1 mutant causes phenotypes similar to RNA exosome mutants due to nucleolar sequestration of the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) Nab2. Decreased nuclear PABP availability is accompanied by genome-wide changes in RNA metabolism, including increased pervasive transcripts levels and snoRNA processing defects. These phenotypes are mitigated by overexpression of PABPs, inhibition of rDNA transcription, or alterations in TRAMP activity. Our results highlight the need for cells to maintain poly(A)-RNA levels in balance with PABPs and other RBPs with mutable substrate specificity across nucleoplasmic and nucleolar RNA processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available