4.0 Article

Gender Differences in Predictors and Long-Term Mortality of New-Onset Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Following Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 342-351

Publisher

MEDICAL TRIBUNE INC
DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.19-00314

Keywords

postoperative atrial fibrillation; aortic stenosis; risk factors; mortality; gender

Funding

  1. Cardiovascular R&D Center - FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, I.P. [UID/IC/00051/2019, UIDP/00051/2020]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/IC/00051/2019, UIDP/00051/2020] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been associated with increased risk of death in women but not in men. We aimed to explore predictors and long-term mortality in POAF following isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery in men and women. Methods: This study included 379 severe aortic stenosis patients with no prior atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent isolated AVR surgery. We used multiple logistic regression to investigate independent gender-specific predictors of new-onset POAF, and we performed Kaplan-Meier (KM) to determine the impact of POAF in long-term mortality according to gender. Results: Advanced age and coronary artery disease prevalence were higher among POAF patients in both genders. On multiple analysis, increased postoperative peak lactate was independently associated with POAF in men, while lower mean aortic valve gradient was associated with POAF in women. Area under the curve (AUC) for the model was 0.77 [0.68-0.86] and 0.69 [0.60-0.78] for men and women, respectively. At 4-year follow-up, POAF was linked to increased risk of death in men but not in women. Conclusion: In severe aortic stenosis, factors associated with POAF and its impact on mortality differed between genders, with an increased risk of death observed only in men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available