4.4 Article

Risk and ambiguity aversion behavior in index-based insurance uptake decisions: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 718-730

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.07.018

Keywords

Index-based insurance; Risk aversion; Ambiguity aversion; Lab-in-the-field experiment

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Fellowship Programme (NFP)
  2. UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  3. UK Department for International Development (DFID) [ES/L012235/1]
  4. ESRC [ES/N013344/2, ES/N013344/1, ES/L012235/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Index-based insurance (IBI) is an innovative pro-poor climate risk management strategy that suffers from low uptake. Evidence on the role of behavioral impediments in adoption of IBI is scant. We conducted lab-in-the-field experiments with 1139 smallholders out of whom 596 have adopted IBI in Ethiopia to elicit their risk and ambiguity aversion behavior, and examine whether risk and/or ambiguity aversion can explain actual IBI uptake decisions. Our study suggests that an increase in risk-aversion increases uptake, but an increase in ambiguity-aversion lowers uptake of IBI. We also find evidence that an increase in risk aversion speeds-up the uptake of IBI, while an increase in ambiguity aversion delays the adoption of IBI. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available