4.2 Article

Introducing the Concept of Virtual Control Groups into Preclinical Toxicology Animal Testing

Journal

ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 343-349

Publisher

SPEKTRUM AKADEMISCHER VERLAG-SPRINGER-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.14573/altex.2001311

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IMI2 Joint Undertaking [777365]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
  3. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sharing legacy data from in vivo toxicity studies offers the opportunity to analyze the variability of control groups stratified for strain, age, duration of study, vehicle, and other experimental conditions. Historical animal control group data collected in a repository could be used to construct virtual control groups (VCGs) for toxicity studies. VCGs are an established concept in clinical trials, but the idea of replacing living beings with virtual data sets has so far not been introduced into the design of regulatory animal studies. The use of VCGs has the potential to reduce animal use by 25% by replacing control group animals with existing randomized data sets. Prerequisites for such an approach are the availability of large and well-structured control data sets as well as thorough statistical evaluations. The foundation of data-sharing has been laid within the Innovative Medicines Initiatives projects eTOX and eTRANSAFE. To establish proof of principle, participating companies have started to collect control group data for subacute (4-week) GLP studies with Wistar rats (the strain preferentially used in Europe) and are characterizing these data for its variability. In a second step, the control group data will be shared among the companies, and cross-company variability will be investigated. In a third step, a set of studies will be analyzed to assess whether the use of VCG data would have influenced the outcome of the study compared to the real control group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available