4.4 Article

Impact of a Cancer Gene Variant Reclassification Program Over a 20-Year Period

Journal

JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages 944-954

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/PO.20.00020

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL132251-02]
  2. Lucy and Henry Billingsley Fund
  3. Jeanne Ann Pitt Professorship in Breast Cancer Research
  4. H. Ben and Isabelle T. Decherd Chair in Internal Medicine at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSEHereditary cancer genetic testing can inform personalized medical management for individuals at increased cancer risk. However, many variants in cancer predisposition genes are individually rare, and traditional tools may be insufficient to evaluate pathogenicity. This analysis presents data on variant classification and reclassification over a 20-year period.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis is a retrospective analysis of > 1.9 million individuals who received hereditary cancer genetic testing from a single clinical laboratory (March 1997 to December 2017). Variant classification included review of evidence from traditional tools (eg, population frequency databases, literature) and laboratory-developed tools (eg, novel statistical methods, in-house RNA analysis) by a multidisciplinary expert committee. Variants may have been reclassified more than once and with more than one line of evidence.RESULTSIn this time period, 62,842 unique variants were observed across 25 cancer predisposition genes, and 2,976 variants were reclassified. Overall, 82.1% of reclassification events were downgrades (eg, variant of uncertain significance [VUS] to benign), and 17.9% were upgrades (eg, VUS to pathogenic). Among reclassified variants, 82.8% were initially classified as VUS, and 47.5% were identified in <= 20 individuals (allele frequency <= 0.001%). Laboratory-developed tools were used in 72.3% of variant reclassification events, which affected > 600,000 individuals. More than 1.3 million patients were identified as carrying a variant that was reclassified within this 20-year time period.CONCLUSIONThe variant classification program used by the laboratory evaluated here enabled the reclassification of variants that were individually rare. Laboratory-developed tools were a key component of this program and were used in the majority of reclassifications. This demonstrates the importance of using robust and novel tools to reclassify rare variants to appropriately inform personalized medical management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available