4.3 Article

Seeking Help Despite the Stigma: Experiential Avoidance as a Moderated Mediator

Journal

JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 132-140

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/cou0000365

Keywords

self-stigma; help seeking; stigma; experiential avoidance; college students

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The help-seeking literature identifies a model wherein public stigma of seeking help is internalized as self-stigma of seeking help, which, in turn, decreases help-seeking outcomes. The current study considered whether experiential avoidance, or a tendency to avoid painful thoughts or emotions, moderates how strongly these stigmata relate to help-seeking intentions among university students. Specifically, this study tested whether experiential avoidance moderates (a) the direct relationship between self-stigma of seeking psychological help and help-seeking intentions and (b) the indirect relationship between public stigma and help-seeking intentions. Conditional process modeling in a university student sample (N = 235) supported these hypotheses. The direct relationship between self-stigma and help-seeking intentions was nonsignificant and weaker for those who reported low experiential avoidance than for those who reported high experiential avoidance. Results also demonstrated a moderated indirect effect wherein the relationship between self-stigma and intentions was nonsignificant among those reporting low levels of experiential avoidance. This suggests that self-stigma may predict help-seeking intentions when avoidance of therapy functions as a means for avoiding unpleasant emotions. These findings suggest that interventions designed to decrease experiential avoidance by increasing openness to unpleasant emotions may offer a novel avenue to attenuate the impact of self-stigma on help-seeking intentions without requiring the difficult task of reducing stigma altogether.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available