3.8 Review

Are anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 alike? The non-small-cell lung cancer paradigm

Journal

ONCOLOGY REVIEWS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 135-143

Publisher

PAGEPRESS PUBL
DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2020.490

Keywords

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor; PD1; PD-L1; lung cancer; immune-related adverse events

Categories

Funding

  1. Roche
  2. Pfizer
  3. Seqirus
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Novartis
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Sanofi
  8. Istituto Gentili
  9. Ipsen
  10. Boehringer-Ingelheim

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 agents may have intrinsic and clinically relevant differences in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. By reviewing currently available indirect evidence on these agents for NSCLC treatment, highlighting possible inter- and intra-class dissimilarities, anti-PD1 agents showed a higher response rate and a better outcome when combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with squamous and PD-L1 low advanced NSCLC, as compared to anti-PD-L1 agents. Conversely, anti-PD-L1 agents were responsible for less severe adverse events (AEs), particularly, immune-related AEs. These differences could be explained by their different specific properties. Considering possible differences between anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 agents could be clinically relevant for treatment tailoring and inspiring new investigational approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available