4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phytoremediation experiments with Helianthus tuberosus under different pH and heavy metal soil concentrations

Journal

HYDROMETALLURGY
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 153-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.10.016

Keywords

Mining remediation; Phytoremediation; Heavy metals; Helianthus tuberosus; Phytoextraction; Phytoaccumulation; pH and growth

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF (PTKA) [FKZ 02S8538]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the last twenty years, phytoremediation became an emerging remediation technology due to its low costs and high sustainability. In this study, experiments for the investigation of phytoextraction and growth behaviour of Helianthus tuberosus under different soil pH values and heavy metal concentrations were performed. Aim of the work was to study the growth and heavy metal accumulation of H. tuberosus under these conditions for a subsequent optimization of the growth conditions and for a later improvement of the growth and phytoremediation yields under field conditions. Experiments were performed for the preparation of the remediation of a contaminated mining site with low to medium heavy metal (HM) concentrations. Plant experiments were carried out in a pH range stepwise from 4.0-6.0 and with a combination of different HM (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn, Pb) in three different concentration ranges (slight/medium/high); experimental conditions were typical for mining sites with Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) and slight to medium heavy metal impact. Yields of roots, tubers, leaves and shoots under the appropriate conditions were investigated, and the heavy metal accumulation of different plant parts was analyzed. As results, soil pH and heavy metal concentrations were identified as crucial factors for plant growth and success of phytoremediation. High accumulation of Fe (up to 1.48 g/kg), Mn (up to 1.68 g/kg) and Zn (up to 853 mg/1

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available