4.7 Article

Influence of physicochemical properties of Brazilian serpentinites on the leaching process for indirect CO2 mineral carbonation

Journal

HYDROMETALLURGY
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 142-151

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.01.003

Keywords

Serpentinite; Leaching; Physicochemical properties; Indirect mineral carbonation; Reactivity

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2013/21244-5, 2011/19920-7]
  2. CNPq [150894/2014-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

pH-swing mineral carbonation is kinetically favorable and requires a short reaction time. It must also obtain a high extraction rate for reactive elements in the leaching process. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the behavior of different serpentinite rocks in the leaching processes; the reactivity of Brazilian serpentinite rocks (such as: S-GO and S-MG) is analyzed based on physicochemical properties in order to understand their relationship to leaching efficiency. Surface area-to-volume ratio (S-BET/V-p) and metals-to-silicon ratio (Sigma(Mg, Ca)/Si) were used to measure reactivity. Leaching was carried out to determine Mg and Fe extraction. Reaction conditions for both serpentinite rocks were: 355-250 pm particle size, 4 M HCI concentration, 100 degrees C, and 2 h of reaction time. Characterization results show that both serpentinite rocks (S-GO and S-MG) have high magnesium (Mg) content S-BET/V-p was 36 for S-GO and 29 for S-MG, while Sigma(Mg, Ca)/Si was 2.64 for S-GO and 120 for S-MG. These results suggest that S-GO is approximately 50% more reactive than S-MG, and that S-MG is limited by low accessible surface (S-BET/V-p) and the high mineralogical complexity (Sigma(Mg, Ca)/Si). Leaching results confirmed the reactivity; Mg and Fe extraction from S-GO was 94 +/- 1%. However, results for S-MG were 34% for Mg and 60% for Fe. In order to increase the reactivity of S-MG, particle size was reduced to 75-63 mu m. Even though S-MG was mechanically activated, Mg and Fe extraction has not increased significantly. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available