4.5 Article

Multi-tracer investigation of river and groundwater interactions: a case study in Nalenggele River basin, northwest China

Journal

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 2015-2029

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-017-1606-0

Keywords

Groundwater/surface-water interactions; Hydrochemistry; Isotopes; Thermal transport; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41602247, 41372238]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental tracers (such as major ions, stable and radiogenic isotopes, and heat) monitored in natural waters provide valuable information for understanding the processes of river-groundwater interactions in arid areas. An integrated framework is presented for interpreting multi-tracer data (major ions, stable isotopes (H-2, O-18), the radioactive isotope Rn-222, and heat) for delineating the river-groundwater interactions in Nalenggele River basin, northwest China. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were undertaken to estimate the bidirectional water exchange associated with small-scale interactions between groundwater and surface water. Along the river stretch, groundwater and river water exchange readily. From the high mountain zone to the alluvial fan, groundwater discharge to the river is detected by tracer methods and end-member mixing models, but the river has also been identified as a losing river using discharge measurements, i.e. discharge is bidirectional. On the delta-front of the alluvial fan and in the alluvial plain, in the downstream area, the characteristics of total dissolved solids values, Rn-222 concentrations and delta O-18 values in the surface water, and patterns derived from a heat-tracing method, indicate that groundwater discharges into the river. With the environmental tracers, the processes of river-groundwater interaction have been identified in detail for better understanding of overall hydrogeological processes and of the impacts on water allocation policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available