4.5 Article

Single and combined effects of phosphate, silicate, and natural organic matter on arsenic removal from soft and hard groundwater using ferric chloride

Journal

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 1183-1190

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-016-1524-6

Keywords

Arsenic; Contamination; Coprecipitation; Health; Laboratory experiments

Funding

  1. International Environmental Research Center (IERC)
  2. UNU & GIST Joint Programme on Science and Technology for Sustainability, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) in the Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to assess the effects of phosphate, silicate and natural organic matter (NOM) on arsenic removal by ferric chloride, batch coprecipitation experiments were conducted over a wide pH range using synthetic hard and soft groundwaters, similar to those found in northern Vietnam. The efficiency of arsenic removal from synthetic groundwater by coprecipitation with FeCl3 was remarkably decreased by the effects of PO4 (3-), SiO4 (4-) and NOM. The negative effects of SiO4 (4-) and NOM on arsenic removal were not as strong as that of PO4 (3-). Combining PO4 (3-) and SiO4 (4-) increased the negative effects on both arsenite (As3+) and arsenate (As5+) removal. The introduction of NOM into the synthetic groundwater containing both PO4 (3-) and SiO4 (4-) markedly magnified the negative effects on arsenic removal. In contrast, both Ca2+ and Mg2+ substantially increased the removal of As3+ at pH 8-12 and the removal of As5+ over the entire pH range. In the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+, the interaction of NOM with Fe was either removed or the arsenic binding to Fe-NOM colloidal associations and/or dissolved complexes were flocculated. Removal of arsenic using coprecipitation by FeCl3 could not sufficiently reduce arsenic contents in the groundwater (350 mu g/L) to meet the WHO guideline for drinking water (10 mu g/L), especially when the arsenic-rich groundwater also contains co-occurring solutes such as PO4 (3-), SiO4 (4-) and NOM; therefore, other remediation processes, such as membrane technology, should be introduced or additionally applied after this coprecipitation process, to ensure the safety of drinking water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available