4.6 Article

Impacts of phosphorus concentration and light intensity on river periphyton biomass and community structure

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 792, Issue 1, Pages 315-330

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-3067-1

Keywords

Eutrophication; Phosphorus-threshold; Algal biofilms; Flow cytometry; Trophic diatom index; Multiple stressors

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NEC04269]
  2. NERC
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh020007] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [ceh020007] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Periphyton growth rate has been identified as the key process that leads to river eutrophication. Effort has focused on reducing phosphorus concentrations to control periphyton biomass, but other factors, such as light, are also important. Within-stream flume mesocosms were deployed in the River Lambourn, UK, to investigate how light intensity and phosphorus concentrations affect periphyton biomass and community structure. Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentrations were tripled in some flumes, and decreased in others by dosing of FeCl3. Increasing SRP concentrations from the ambient concentration of 49 A mu g l(-1) to 155 A mu g l(-1) had no effect on biomass, but community composition (by flow cytometry) shifted from diatom to cyanobacterial dominance. Reducing light levels (equivalent to riparian tree shading) decreased biomass by 40%, showing that the biofilms were light limited at SRP concentration >= 49 A mu g l(-1). Periphyton were phosphorus/light co-limited when SRP concentrations were reduced to 33 A mu g l(-1). Further reductions in SRP concentration (23 A mu g l(-1)) resulted in phosphorus limitation of periphyton biomass and increased dominance of diatoms and chlorophytes within the biofilm. Reducing light intensity through providing riparian tree shading could be an important management tool to reduce periphyton biomass and improve ecological status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available