4.6 Article

Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo Analysis From IMPROVE-IT

Journal

JACC: CARDIOONCOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 385-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.07.008

Keywords

acute coronary syndromes; cancer; ezetimibe; lipid-lowering therapy; lipids; malignancy; statin

Funding

  1. Merck
  2. Amgen
  3. Geneva University Hospitals
  4. Eugenio Litta
  5. Athemis Foundations
  6. Arena
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. Daiichi-Sankyo
  10. Eisai
  11. Eli Lilly
  12. Janssen
  13. Sanofi
  14. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Abbott
  15. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Amgen
  16. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Aralez
  17. Brigham and Women's Hospital: AstraZeneca
  18. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  19. Brigham and Women's Hospital: BRAHMS
  20. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Daiichi-Sankyo
  21. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Eisai
  22. Brigham and Women's Hospital: GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Intarcia
  24. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Janssen
  25. Brigham and Women's Hospital: MedImmune
  26. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Merck
  27. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Novartis
  28. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Pfizer
  29. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Poxel
  30. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Quark Pharmaceuticals
  31. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Roche
  32. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Takeda
  33. Brigham and Women's Hospital: The Medicines Company
  34. Brigham and Women's Hospital: Zora Biosciences
  35. DaiichiSankyo
  36. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome, we conducted a prospective systematic analysis of malignancy events in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). METHODS Within IMPROVE-IT, 17,708 patients post-acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either ezetimibe 10 mg or matching placebo on a background of simvastatin 40 mg who took $1 dose of the study drug. Suspected tumors (benign and malignant) reported by investigators or identified from a review of adverse events were adjudicated by oncologists without knowledge of drug assignment. The primary malignancy endpoint included new, relapsing, or progressive malignancies (excluding nonmelanotic skin malignancies). The secondary endpoint was death due to malignancy. RESULTS In this trial, 1,470 patients developed the primary malignancy endpoint during a median 6 years of follow-up. The most common malignancy locations were prostate (18.9%), lung (16.8%), and bladder (8.8%) with no differences by treatment group (p > 0.05 for each location). Kaplan-Meier 7-year rates of malignancies were similar with ezetimibe and placebo (10.2% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 1.14; p = 0.56), as were the rates for malignancy death (3.8% vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.88 to 1.23; p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS Among 17,708 patients receiving simvastatin 40 mg daily, those randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg daily had a similar incidence of malignancy and deaths due to malignancy compared with those receiving placebo during a median follow-up of 6 years (96,377 patient-years). (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available