4.5 Article

A comprehensive approach to identification of pathogenic FANCA variants in Fanconi anemia patients and their families

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 237-254

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23366

Keywords

Fanconi anemia; FANCA; functional assay; pathogenic mutations; recessive disorder

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, NIH [NIH RO1HL120922]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), NIH [UL1TR001866]
  4. NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA)
  5. Howard Hughes Faculty Scholar Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare recessive DNA repair deficiency resulting from mutations in one of at least 22 genes. Two-thirds of FA families harbor mutations in FANCA. To genotype patients in the International Fanconi Anemia Registry (IFAR) we employed multiple methodologies, screening 216 families for FANCA mutations. We describe identification of 57 large deletions and 261 sequence variants, in 159 families. All but seven families harbored distinct combinations of two mutations demonstrating high heterogeneity. Pathogenicity of the 18 novel missense variants was analyzed functionally by determining the ability of the mutant cDNA to improve the survival of a FANCA-null cell line when treated with MMC. Overexpressed pathogenic missense variants were found to reside in the cytoplasm, and nonpathogenic in the nucleus. RNA analysis demonstrated that two variants (c.522G>C and c.1565A>G), predicted to encode missense variants, which were determined to be nonpathogenic by a functional assay, caused skipping of exons 5 and 16, respectively, and are most likely pathogenic. We report 48 novel FANCA sequence variants. Defining both variants in a large patient cohort is a major step toward cataloging all FANCA variants, and permitting studies of genotype-phenotype correlations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available