4.1 Article

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF LIGHT-BASED INTELLIGENT SEARCH AND OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS

Journal

LIGHT & ENGINEERING
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 51-59

Publisher

ZNACK PUBLISHING HOUSE
DOI: 10.33383/2019-029

Keywords

optimization; optics inspired optimization; ray optimization; artificial intelligence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Classical optimization and search algorithms are not effective for nonlinear, complex, dynamic large-scaled problems with incomplete information. Hence, intelligent optimization algorithms, which are inspired by natural phenomena such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, and so on have been proposed as working solutions over time. Many of the intelligent optimization algorithms are based on physics and biology, and they work by modelling or simulating different nature-based processes. Due to philosophy of constantly researching the best and absence of the most effective algorithm for all kinds of problems, new methods or new versions of existing methods are proposed to see if they can cope with very complex optimization problems. Two recently proposed algorithms, namely ray optimization and optics inspired optimization, seem to be inspired by light, and they are entitled as light-based intelligent optimization algorithms in this paper. These newer intelligent search and optimization algorithms are inspired by the law of refraction and reflection of light. Studies of these algorithms are compiled and the performance analysis of light-based i ntelligent optimization algorithms on unconstrained benchmark functions and constrained real engineering design problems is performed under equal conditions for the first time in this article. The results obtained show that ray optimization is superior, and effectively solves many complex problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available