4.2 Article

Breastfeeding and motor development: A longitudinal cohort study

Journal

HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 9-16

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.10.001

Keywords

Breastfeeding; Motor development; Child development; Raine Study

Funding

  1. National Health & Medical Research Council [211912, 003209, 353514]
  2. Telethon Institute for Child Health Research
  3. Raine Medical Research Foundation
  4. UWA Faculty of Medicine
  5. Dentistry and Health Sciences
  6. Women's and Infant's Research Foundation
  7. Curtin University
  8. Australian Post-graduate Award scholarship
  9. University of Western Australia (UWA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: While there is a large body of work supporting the importance of early feeding practices on cognitive, immunity, behavioural and mental outcomes, few longitudinal studies have focused on motor development. The relationship between duration of breast feeding and motor development outcomes at 10, 14, and 17 years were examined. Methods: Data were obtained from the Western Australian Pregnancy (Raine) Study. There were 2868 live births recorded and children were examined for motor proficiency at 10 (M = 10.54, SD = 2.27), 14 (M = 14.02, SD = 2.33) and 17 (M = 16.99, SD = 2.97) years using the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development (MAND). Using linear mixed models, adjusted for covariates known to affect motor development, the influence of predominant breast feeding for <6 months and >6 months on motor development outcomes was examined. Results: Breast feeding for >= 6 months was positively associated with improved motor development outcomes at 10, 14 and 17 years of age (p = 0.019, R 1.38) when adjusted for child's sex, maternal age, alcohol intake, family income, hypertensive status, gestational stress and mode of delivery. Conclusion: Early life feeding practices have an influence on motor development outcomes into late childhood and adolescence independent of sociodemographic factors. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available