4.5 Article

Amelogenesis imperfecta caused by N-terminal enamelin point mutations in mice and men is driven by endoplasmic reticulum stress

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1863-1876

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddx090

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [075945, 093113, 105610]
  2. Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit
  3. Wellcome Trust UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

'Amelogenesis imperfecta' (AI) describes a group of inherited diseases of dental enamel that have major clinical impact. Here, we identify the aetiology driving AI in mice carrying a p.S55I mutation in enamelin; one of the most commonly mutated proteins underlying AI in humans. Our data indicate that the mutation inhibits the ameloblast secretory pathway leading to ER stress and an activated unfolded protein response (UPR). Initially, with the support of the UPR acting in pro-survival mode, Enam(p.S55I) heterozygous mice secreted structurally normal enamel. However, enamel secreted thereafter was structurally abnormal; presumably due to the UPR modulating ameloblast behaviour and function in an attempt to relieve ER stress. Homozygous mutant mice failed to produce enamel. We also identified a novel heterozygous ENAM(p.L31R) mutation causing AI in humans. We hypothesize that ER stress is the aetiological factor in this case of human AI as it shared the characteristic phenotype described above for the Enam(p.S55I) mouse. We previously demonstrated that AI in mice carrying the Amelx(p.Y64H) mutation is a proteinopathy. The current data indicate that AI in Enam(p.S55I) mice is also a proteinopathy, and based on comparative phenotypic analysis, we suggest that human AI resulting from the ENAM(p.L31R) mutation is another proteinopathic disease. Identifying a common aetiology for AI resulting from mutations in two different genes opens the way for developing pharmaceutical interventions designed to relieve ER stress or modulate the UPR during enamel development to ameliorate the clinical phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available