4.3 Article

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using 100-300 μm versus 300-500 μm CalliSpheres microspheres in patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 1582-1587

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_543_20

Keywords

Advanced-stage of hepatocellular carcinoma; CalliSpheres microspheres; drug-eluting beads; transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) using 100-300 mu m versus 300-500 mu m CalliSpheres microspheres (CSMs) for treating multiple hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the largest nodule measuring between 5 and 10 cm. Methods: Eighty-one advanced-stage HCC patients treated by DEB-TACE between January 2017 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 48 patients in the 100-300 mu m group and 33 patients in the 300-500 mu m group. Treatment response, liver function tests, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: At 6 months, the response rates in the 100-300 mu m group were higher than those in the 300-500 mu m group (P < 0.05). Disease control rates in the 100-300 mu m group were higher than those in the 300-500 mu m group at 1, 3, and 6 months (P < 0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in the 100-300 mu m group (P < 0.05). Visual analog score points were higher in the 300-500 mu m group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in complications between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of small-diameter CSMs in multiple HCC with the largest nodule size of 5-10 cm provides better treatment response and longer PFS and OS for treating advanced-stage HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available