3.8 Article

Synthesis, characterizations, and magnetic properties of FeCoNiTi-based high-entropy alloys

Journal

EMERGENT MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 655-662

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42247-020-00110-4

Keywords

Mechanical alloying; Phase evolution; Magnetic behavior; High-entropy alloy

Funding

  1. DST-INSPIRE project New Delhi India [IFA-12-PH-43]
  2. CSIR New Delhi India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present report describes the effect of Mn, Cr, and Al on phase formation, magnetic, and hardness behavior of FeCoNiTi-based high-entropy alloys (HEAs). The selected HEAs are synthesized through mechanical alloying (MA). A single solid solution of fcc and mixture of fcc + R-phase are evolved for synthesized FeCoNiTiCr and FeCoNiTiMn HEAs respectively. However, mixture of fcc and bcc and minor fraction of R-phase are evolved for synthesized FeCoNiTiAl HEA. After annealing at 700 degrees C, a new bcc phase is evolved for FeCoNiTiMn HEA. On the other hand, there is no such phase formation that has been observed for FeCoNiTiCr and FeCoNiTiAl HEAs. All the synthesized HEAs exhibit ferromagnetic characteristics. The synthesized FeCoNiTiAl HEA possesses better semi-hard magnetic characteristics (Ms = 53.67 emu/g, Hc = 88.0 Oe) as compared to the synthesized FeCoNiTiCr (Ms = 24.17 emu/g, Hc = 151.6 Oe) and FeCoNiTiMn (Ms = 18.04 emu/g, Hc = 32.0 Oe) HEAs. After annealing at 700 degrees C, the magnetic characteristics changed dramatically. For annealed FeCoNiTiCr HEA, the value of Ms decreased to 1.83 emu/g from 24.17 emu/g. However, for annealed FeCoNiTiMn and FeCoNiTiAl HEAs, the saturation magnetization increased to 41.29 emu/g from 18.40 emu/g and 70.04 emu/g from 53.67 emu/g respectively. The 700 degrees C annealed FeCoNiTiMn HEA possesses better semi-hard magnetic characteristics along with better hardness (164 +/- 4 HV) as compared to the synthesized and annealed FeCoNiTiCr and FeCoNiTiAl HEAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available