4.6 Review

Tumor phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in therapy resistance and metastatic dissemination of rectal cancer: Opportunities for signaling-adapted therapies

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 114-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.003

Keywords

Rectal cancer; PI3K; Radiation; Angiogenesis; Metastasis; Biomarkers; Tumor hypoxia; Tyrosine kinase array

Funding

  1. European Union 7th Framework Programme [222741-METOXIA]
  2. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority [2010014, 2012002]
  3. Norwegian Cancer Society [2006183]
  4. Akershus University Hospital [2010003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) comprises heterogeneous tumors with predominant hypoxic components, a hallmark of the tumor microenvironment and determinant of resistance to cytotoxic therapies, local recurrence, and metastatic progression. A rational integration of molecularly targeted agents in established combined-modality treatment regimens may improve local and systemic disease control, but will require a clear definition of functional biomarkers for patient stratification. In a prospective study of LARC patients given neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, we applied a ldnase substrate array technology to analyze the patients' tumor biopsies sampled at the time of diagnosis, and observed that receptor tyrosine ldnase activities integrated by high phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling were correlated both with poor tumor response to the neoadjuvant treatment and adverse progression-free survival. Conceptually, the specific tumor signature of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling activity may point to actionable therapy targets in LARC patients with unfavorable disease features. Clinical trial registration number NCT00278694. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available