4.6 Review

Molecular pathology of thyroid tumours of follicular cells: a review of genetic alterations and their clinicopathological relevance

Journal

HISTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 6-31

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/his.13380

Keywords

anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; follicular thyroid carcinoma; molecular pathology; papillary thyroid carcinoma; poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; thyroid cancer; thyroid markers; thyroid tumours

Funding

  1. Italian Government-Ministero Della Salute Grant [RF-2011-02350857]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. Knowledge of the molecular pathology of thyroid tumours originating from follicular cells has greatly advanced in the past several years. Common molecular alterations, such as BRAF p.V600E, RAS point mutations, and fusion oncogenes (RET-PTC being the prototypical example), have been, respectively, associated with conventional papillary carcinoma, follicular-patterned tumours (follicular adenoma, follicular carcinoma, and the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma/non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features), and with papillary carcinomas from young patients and arising after exposure to ionising radiation, respectively. The remarkable correlation between genotype and phenotype shows how specific, mutually exclusive molecular changes can promote tumour development and initiate a multistep tumorigenic process that is characterised by aberrant activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-PTEN-AKT signalling. Molecular alterations are becoming useful biomarkers for diagnosis and risk stratification, and as potential treatment targets for aggressive forms of thyroid carcinoma. What follows is a review of the principal genetic alterations of thyroid tumours originating from follicular cells and of their clinicopathological relevance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available