4.5 Article

Clinical features of pediatric autoimmune hepatitis in Japan: A nationwide survey

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 286-294

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12998

Keywords

autoimmune hepatitis; corticosteroids; growth; primary sclerosing cholangitis

Funding

  1. Health Labor Science Research grants from Research on Measures for Intractable Diseases, the Intractable Hepato-Biliary Diseases Study Group in Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimThe purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in Japan. MethodsQuestionnaires that asked about patients newly diagnosed with AIH from 2009 to 2013 were sent to hospitals certified as training facilities for pediatrics in January 2015. ResultsA total of 35 patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 10years (range, 3months-15years), and the male-to-female ratio was 2:3. Female patients were more prevalent among those older than 10years and male patients were more prevalent in those younger than 10years. Fifteen patients had jaundice as a subjective symptom, and 5 had hepatic coma grade II. Liver histology classified 20 as chronic hepatitis, 8 as acute hepatitis, and 4 as cirrhosis. Liver histology was not described in 4 patients. Among the 35 patients, 32 were treated with corticosteroids and 29 were initially treated with methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Corticosteroid therapy was effective in 27 patients and ineffective in 1 patient. Plasma exchange with continuous i.v. infusion of cyclosporine A was given to 7 patients with acute hepatitis. Of these, 4 patients presented with fulminant hepatitis and received high-flow, continuous hemodiafiltration. ConclusionsThis survey clarified that the clinical profile of pediatric AIH in Japan is not only different from that of adult AIH in Japan but is also different from that of pediatric AIH in other countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available