4.5 Article

Comparison of efficacy of low-carbohydrate and low-fat diet education programs in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized controlled study

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages E22-E29

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12918

Keywords

carbohydrate; fat; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [12162MFDS159]
  2. Soonchunhyang University Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Composition of macronutrients is important in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Diet education programs that mainly emphasize reducing fat consumption have been used for NAFLD patients. We compared the efficacy of conventional low-fat diet education with low-carbohydrate diet education in Korean NAFLD patients. Methods: One hundred and six NAFLD patients were randomly allocated to low-fat diet education or low-carbohydrate education groups for 8weeks. Liver chemistry, liver/spleen ratio, and visceral fat using abdominal tomography were measured. Results: Intrahepatic fat accumulation decreased significantly in the low-carbohydrate group compared to low-fat group (liver/spleen 0.85 vs. 0.92, P<0.05). Normalization of ALT activity at week 8 was 38.5% for the low-carbohydrate and 16.7% for the low-fat group (P=0.016). Not only liver enzyme, but also low density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure levels significantly decreased in the low-carbohydrate group. Total energy intake was also further decreased in the low-carbohydrate group compared to the low-fat group. Although body weight changes were not different between the two groups, the carbohydrate group had a lower total abdominal fat amount. Conclusions: A low-carbohydrate diet program is more realistic and effective in reducing total energy intake and hepatic fat content in Korean NAFLD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available