4.7 Review

Nonthermal physical technologies to decontaminate and extend the shelf-life of fruits and vegetables: Trends aiming at quality and safety

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Volume 57, Issue 10, Pages 2095-2111

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1046547

Keywords

Food preservation; physical methods; emerging technologies; fruits and vegetables; quality and safety; food shelf-life

Funding

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) [PEst-OE/AGR/UI0690/2014, SFRH/BD/92994/2013]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/92994/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minimally processed fruits and vegetables are one of the major growing sectors in food industry. This growing demand for healthy and convenient foods with fresh-like properties is accompanied by concerns surrounding efficacy of the available sanitizing methods to appropriately deal with food-borne diseases. In fact, chemical sanitizers do not provide an efficient microbial reduction, besides being perceived negatively by the consumers, dangerous for human health, and harmful to the environment, and the conventional thermal treatments may negatively affect physical, nutritional, or bioactive properties of these perishable foods. For these reasons, the industry is investigating alternative nonthermal physical technologies, namely innovative packaging systems, ionizing and ultraviolet radiation, pulsed light, highpower ultrasound, cold plasma, high hydrostatic pressure, and dense phase carbon dioxide, as well as possible combinations between them or with other preservation factors (hurdles). This review discusses the potential of these novel or emerging technologies for decontamination and shelf-life extension of fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Advantages, limitations, and challenges related to its use in this sector are also highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available