4.2 Article

βsglobin gene haplotype and the stroke risk among Egyptian children with sickle cell disease

Journal

HEMATOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 362-367

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10245332.2017.1403736

Keywords

Sickle cell disease; beta S globin; TCD; stroke; Benin; bantu; Egypt; beta s haplotype

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aim of work: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited disease of the beta globin gene. The beta(s) globin gene haplotypes are Senegal, Benin, Bantu, Cameroon, Arab-Indian and atypical haplotypes. In SCD, stroke is a life-threatening event in both adults and children. In light of paucity of studies on beta(s) globin gene haplotypes in Egypt, we aimed to determine beta(s) globin gene haplotypes in children with SCD and study their impact on stroke risk. Methods: Fifty-two SCD patients were included in the study, they were 26 males and 26 females with age range from 3 to 18 years old. The PCR-RFLP technique was used for the determination of beta(s) globin gene haplotypes. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) was done to identify patients at risk of stroke. Results: Benin/Benin was the most prevalent haplotype detected in 50% followed by Benin/ Bantu in 30.8% of studied patients. TCD study showed that 14/52 (26.9%) patients had abnormally high TCD flow velocities (TCD velocities >= 170 cm/s) and thus considered high stroke risk group, whereas 38/52 (73.1%) patients had TCD flow velocities <170 cm/s and are considered low stroke risk group. Stroke risk was not found to be associated with beta(s) globin gene haplotype (p = .532). Conclusion: This study provides a relevant contribution to our understanding of the anthropological and historical background of the population in Egypt where Benin haplotype is the commonest beta(s) globin gene haplotype and homozygous Benin/Benin is associated with higher stroke risk than other haplotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available