3.8 Review

Understanding superiority, noninferiority, and equivalence for clinical trials

Journal

INDIAN DERMATOLOGY ONLINE JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 890-894

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_130_20

Keywords

Clinical trials; equivalence; methodology; noninferiority; superiority

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Randomized control trialsare the gold standard for testing the efficacy of new interventions. Historically, superiority trials were methods of choice as reference (standard) interventions were not established for many disease conditions. However currently, reference interventions are available for most of adverse conditions. Despite this, many investigators are using superiority trials in comparison to more suitable noninferiority and equivalence trials. The application of noninferiority and equivalence trials is on the rise, but by and large, these trials are poorly understood, ill-conceived, inappropriately analyzed, and reported and misinterpreted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available