4.0 Article

Benchmark study comparing liftover tools for genome conversion of epigenome sequencing data

Journal

NAR GENOMICS AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa054

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1147974, 1156408]
  2. Cancer Institute New South Wales, Translational Program Grant (CINSW TPG)
  3. Australia Prostate Cancer Research Centre - NSW (APCRC)
  4. Australian Government through NCI Raijin under the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme in 2019 [wk73]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1147974, 1156408] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As reference genome assemblies are updated there is a need to convert epigenome sequence data from older genome assemblies to newer versions, to facilitate data integration and visualization on the same coordinate system. Conversion can be done by re-alignment of the original sequence data to the new assembly or by converting the coordinates of the data between assemblies using a mapping file, an approach referred to as 'liftover'. Compared to re-alignment approaches, liftover is a more rapid and cost-effective solution. Here, we benchmark six liftover tools commonly used for conversion between genome assemblies by coordinates, including UCSC liftOver, rtracklayer::liftOver, CrossMap, NCBI Remap, flo and segment_liftover to determine how they performed for whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) and ChIP-seq data. Our results show high correlation between the six tools for conversion of 43 WGBS paired samples. For the chromatin sequencing data we found from interval conversion of 366 ChIP-Seq datasets, segment_liftover generates more reliable results than USCS liftOver. However, we found some regions do not always remain the same after liftover. To further increase the accuracy of liftover and avoid misleading results, we developed a three-step guideline that removes aberrant regions to ensure more robust genome conversion between reference assemblies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available